Today, on March 19, the Supreme Court of India is set to address a significant cluster of approximately 200 petitions that challenge the execution of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA). These petitions specifically seek to halt the implementation of both the CAA and the Citizenship Amendment Rules of 2024. The petitions collectively raise concerns and legal arguments against the enforcement of these legislative measures. This hearing marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate surrounding the CAA and its implications.Today, on March 19, the Supreme Court of India is set to address a significant cluster of approximately 200 petitions that challenge the execution of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA). These petitions specifically seek to halt the implementation of both the CAA and the Citizenship Amendment Rules of 2024. The petitions collectively raise concerns and legal arguments against the enforcement of these legislative measures. This hearing marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate surrounding the CAA and its implications.
On March 11, the Central government of India officially enforced the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), which had been passed in Parliament in December 2019, marking a significant milestone in Indian legislative history. The CAA serves as an amendment to the Citizenship Act of 1955, introducing specific provisions aimed at addressing the citizenship status of certain migrants residing in India.
Under the provisions of the CAA, migrants belonging to the Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Parsi, Buddhist, or Christian communities from neighboring countries such as Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, who entered India on or before December 31, 2014, due to religious persecution or fear of persecution in their home countries, are eligible for an expedited route to Indian citizenship. This expedited pathway is a departure from the standard naturalization process, which typically requires a longer period of residency and fulfillment of various criteria.
The implementation of the CAA has been a subject of extensive debate and scrutiny within India and internationally. Critics of the bill contend that by associating citizenship with religious identity, it discriminates against Muslim migrants and subverts the secular values contained in the Indian Constitution. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the exclusion of certain marginalized groups, such as Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar, who also face persecution but are not covered under the provisions of the CAA.
On the other hand, proponents of the CAA assert that it is a humanitarian effort meant to offer safety and sanctuary to marginalized religious communities from surrounding nations. They contend that the CAA is consistent with India’s historical role as a safe haven for refugees and has no bearing on the citizenship rights that now exist for Indian citizens, regardless of their religious affiliation.
The implementation of the CAA has also been met with widespread protests across India, with demonstrators expressing concerns about the law’s potential to marginalize and exclude certain communities. These protests have sparked a broader conversation about the principles of inclusivity, secularism, and pluralism in Indian society.
A panel headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, accompanied by Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, will preside over the hearings for the petitions. The petitioners assert that the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) discriminates against the Muslim community. They argue that such religious discrimination is unjustified and violates the right to equality guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution.
In 2020, Kerala made history by becoming the first state to approach the Supreme Court, challenging the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) on grounds of violating the Indian Constitution’s principles of equality. Additionally, Kerala has filed a second case in the highest court, contesting the regulations associated with the CAA.
Last week, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal raised a plea filed by the Kerala-based Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) before the Supreme Court. In the petition, IUML raised concerns about the timing of the Central government’s decision to implement the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), just days before the Lok Sabha elections.
Other petitioners in the case include Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, Assam Congress leader Debabrata Saikia, TMC leader Mahua Moitra, as well as NGOs such as Rihai Manch and Citizens Against Hate. Additionally, the petitioners comprise law students and the Assam Advocates Association.
Owaisi condemned the Bharatiya Janata Party’s position on the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), stating that creating legislation based on religion is not acceptable in the country.
“This issue isn’t limited to political factions; it concerns the entire nation. Are we considering rendering 17 crore Muslims stateless? This goes against the fundamental principles of the Constitution. It wouldn’t withstand even a basic test of reasonableness,” stated the AIMIM chief.
Also Read: Allegations: YouTuber Elvish Yadav Involved in Organizing Snake Venom at Rave Events, Sources Say
